China hace ilegales los deepfakes

El gobierno chino acaba de declarar ilegal hacer pasar falsificaciones u otros medios creados por la IA como legítimos.

Cracking Down

The Chinese government just made it illegal to pass off deepfakes or other AI-created media as legitimate.

The Cyberspace Administration of China will begin to enforce the new law on January 1, according to Reuters, at which point anyone who uses artificial intelligence or virtual reality tech to synthesize realistic media will have to disclose that their creations aren’t real life. Citing concerns of national security, the new law is meant to nip fake news and political misinformation in the bud — though, at the same time, it further tightens China’s hold on the online lives of its citizens.

Preserving Stability

The new law puts China ahead of the federal U.S. government in terms of regulations to prevent deepfakes from causing political instability. However, The Verge reports that China’s new law bears similarity to a California law enacted in October.

California doesn’t specifically mention deepfake tech by name — instead, it makes it illegal to publish misleading media that could damage a candidate’s reputation or deceive voters.

Broader Action

China’s new law allows the government to prosecute both the individuals who make deepfakes and the video platforms that host them.

“With the adoption of new technologies, such as deepfake, in online video and audio industries, there have been risks in using such content to disrupt social order and violate people’s interests,” the Cyberspace Administration of China told video platforms, per The Verge, “creating political risks and bringing a negative impact to national security and social stability.”

READ MORE: China seeks to root out fake news and deepfakes with new online content rules [Reuters]

More on deepfakes: Deepfake Pioneer: “Perfectly Real” Fake Vids Are Six Months Away

Paty Vazquez.

Related Posts
Leer más

Salesforce paga alto por Slack

El director de Salesforce Marc Benioff nunca podría ser acusado de pagar de menos por una empresa, como lo demuestra su propuesta de 27.700 millones de dólares para la compra de acciones de Slack.